The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), also known as the Indian Justice Code, marks a significant overhaul in India’s legal landscape. Enacted on July 1, 2024, the BNS replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which had been in force since the British colonial era.
The death penalty remains one of the most debated topics in the Indian legal system, often invoking strong emotions and varied opinions. One significant case that added to this debate is B.A. Umesh v. Registrar, Supreme Court of India (2014).
The death penalty has always been a subject of intense debate and scrutiny in India. Among the many cases that have shaped this discourse, the case of Sushil Sharma v. State of Delhi (2013) stands out. This case involves the brutal murder of Naina Sahni by her husband, Sushil Sharma, a crime that shook the nation and led to significant legal and social implications.
The death penalty is a contentious issue worldwide, and India is no exception. Over the years, the Indian judiciary has dealt with numerous cases involving capital punishment, often sparking debates on morality, legality, and human rights. One such notable case is Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v.
In the realm of Indian criminal jurisprudence, the imposition of sentences plays a crucial role in maintaining justice and upholding legal principles.
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Anokhilal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) sheds light on the application of the death penalty in contemporary Indian jurisprudence.
The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Amit vs State of U.P (2012) provides a profound exploration of the nuances surrounding the imposition of the death penalty. This landmark case involves critical issues about the application of capital punishment, particularly in cases where the accused is young and the crimes are severe.
The legal and ethical considerations surrounding the death penalty are complex and multifaceted, as highlighted by the Supreme Court of India’s decision in the case of Vikram Singh & Ors vs State of Punjab on January 25, 2010.
The death penalty has always sparked heated debate, particularly regarding the humane treatment of those convicted and the intricate legal complexities surrounding it.
In a landmark decision that reverberates with the principles of justice and severity of crime, the Supreme Court of India recently ruled on Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 2010: Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar vs. The State of Haryana.
DISCLAIMER
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates are not permitted to solicit work or advertise their services. This website is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation. By accessing this website, you acknowledge and confirm the following:
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience. By continuing to browse, you consent to our Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy.
